Home media acquisition, production, storage, and use are on the cusp of a radical change as PC and network technologies integrate all media. Most current residences contain a jumbled mix of analog and digital equipment that will be replaced by all-digital, networked media equipment: the Home Media Network. There is no question this change is coming; the question is “how soon”? The goal of this article is to spur consumer electronics and computer manufacturers to start delivering the Home Media Network—early adopting users are already influencing and stimulating the market. We hope this discussion of the issues, the advantages, and the breakthrough possibilities will provoke action.
Typical homes have a plethora of answering machines, portable audio devices, cameras, computers, stereos, telephones, and TV sets. At least four independent networks carry audio, data, telephony, and TV. Some homes add intercoms, home theaters, surveillance cameras, and home automation controllers. We talk about home audiovisual (A/V) systems, but applying the word “system” is generous. For most consumers, it is difficult (or impossible) to interconnect all home components. In the living room, the proliferation of remote controls and cabling demonstrates the lack of integration (see Figure 1). Stereos do have a number of connected components, including TV and VCR, and high-end homes may even centralize audio sources and amplifiers and place speakers—wired or wireless—in every room. However, to truly integrate all home media requires a vast collection of special equipment, a certain amount of patience, trained operators, and a full-time maintenance/user consultant (the responsible person in the family).
Consumer-grade PCs demonstrate how media can be integrated. They can produce surround sound effects, play/write CDs or DVDs, tune/record TV, and store/print/display photos and art. They can also act as a telephone and answering machine. However, current PCs are not the answer, because they tend to be bulky, ugly, and noisy, making them unwelcome in the living room. Also, the benefit of a PC’s flexibility and extensibility comes at the price of complexity, making their management and maintenance almost as difficult as the home A/V integration task.
We believe a single home network that connects a PC-based server (or servers) to specialized media I/O appliances (and other devices) is likely to evolve. Network plug-and-play solves the installation problem. The collection of two, six, or twelve digital speakers will be able to play the appropriate sounds ranging from stereo reproduction, to 5.1 and 10.2 surround sound, respectively. Network monitors will display images and video; networked microphones and cameras will enable telephony, videoconferencing, and recording.
Instead of the need to match individual remote controls with each A/V source, any remote control should command the unified system (for example, pressing the pause button pauses the media in the room). However, current remote controls are too limited for the home media network we envision. A wireless mouse/keyboard is adequate, but of questionable use. Palm-sized devices can be used as controllers, but are inadequate for content presentation. We believe the tablet PC will be the next-generation universal remote control because it can support a very rich UI, and also display and capture media. Control by speech and gestures is an often-mentioned future development that is promising, but currently difficult to achieve.
To the technophile, a digital home media network is obvious and inevitable. There are solvable technical and political problems, such as copyright protection. Digital media has already infiltrated the home in the form of CDs, DVDs, personal video recorders (PVRs) such as TiVo, and portable digital music players—surely integration can’t be that far away, can it? On the other hand, one might ask: why bother? Why bother, indeed, when existing wiring is not sufficient, much content is still in analog format, and the desired equipment is selectively marketed to the high-end buyer?
Motivation
The first reason inspiring the call for the Home Media Network is that integration of all media into a single digital networked system decreases complexity, cabling, and cost. The second reason is to make all I/O devices multipurpose and general. Think of word processor hardware, which has been displaced by the PC: it made the most sense to make the I/O devices (keyboard/mouse/display) as multipurpose as possible. Similarly, speakers should play sound from any source (not just, say, radio), while a microphone should take in any sound input (rather than being just for the telephone, or the intercom, or the memo recorder). Displays should be used for anything their size and quality can support: a small display might be used as a clock and to flash reminders, while a large, high-resolution display can handle TV, DVD, home video, Web pages, art, photos, and ambient environments (for example, a train ride on the Orient Express).
These reasons are compelling enough, but to really appreciate the value of the Home Media Network, one needs to view it as a platform that can take advantage of software creativity to enable breakthroughs in media usage.
A Possible Usage Scenario. Imagine you are watching a TV show, and a Web site is mentioned; you click “bookmark” on your remote. Later, while Web surfing on a PC or TV you follow the bookmark to the Web site or you simply just surf backward through your past, since the network “knows” what you were doing. You watch a baseball game, bookmark certain plays and email them to a friend, who had recorded the game. Later, your friend is able to watch your selected highlights. The next morning you bring up the local newspaper on the ceiling display. Then you watch a video-on-demand lecture while exercising. A camera and microphone co-located with a person-sized monitor allow you to videoconference with a cyberized background.
Software systems are increasingly taking the management aspect out of media management. We posit a world without arcane, nested menus that force users to memorize channel numbers, song numbers, radio frequencies, or the special key combination required to set the time (or record the message, or perform some other function). Software can learn the kind of music or programs we like. One can ask for songs selected by a favorite DJ, but when the DJ picks a song the system knows you don’t like, it will skip it or substitute something else. Once a song is rejected by you, there is no reason to ever hear it again (at least not in your home). Software will also learn the kind of photos and art you like and will sort through the collection of photographs that you haven’t bothered to put in a photo album and present them to let you identify the best images. Device management will also be easier, allowing one to simply plug any device into power and the network (Jini, HAVi, and universal plug-and-play are already addressing this).
The possibilities of media software are exciting—indeed, many TiVo and Ultimate TV users have requested fast forward of a live broadcast! But even without considering these exciting prospects, the status quo deserves to be put on the defensive. Why keep analog? It is not inherently cheaper. It is lower in quality. Let’s face it, analog has reached the end of its useful life, and it is time to bury it. This means a complete change in every aspect of audio and TV distribution, display surfaces, controllers, networks, computers, and how all of these work together and are controlled. To achieve this goal requires a common vision backed with effort, determination, a few standards—and getting started!
Building the Home Media Network
The first requirement for a Home Media Network is an Internet Protocol (IP) network that replaces phone, and cable TV wiring. Switched 100Mbps Ethernet is inexpensive and meets long-term home media networking needs for higher-quality video. Wireless, phone, and power networks operate at lower rates, limiting the number and quality of video streams, although they can be used in a limited fashion and are getting faster each year [2, 3].
The image in Figure 2 shows a coat and “wiring closet” with wired and wireless Ethernet, wired and wireless telephony, cable and DSL modems, firewall, and a small UPS. Compare this tidy installation with your A/V and PC cabling. The second requirement is to replace TV sets with monitors (or other digital displays such as LCD projectors). TVs are capable of some new applications, such art display or TV screen savers but they are very poor at displaying text unless fonts are very large. This means that for email, browsing, and presentations, very little text can be displayed at once, and most material prepared for computers is illegible. It is essential to upgrade interlace-scan TV monitors to progressive-scan, computer-grade monitors that will enable text-rich and high-precision applications.
Eventually, all media devices will be digital and attached to an IP network. However, we foresee a very long interim that includes legacy analog. To cope with the transition, each legacy analog device (for example, receiver or TV set) will be driven by a digital transformer that connects it to the digital network. As an example, Voyetra Turtle Beach’s Audiotron feeds a stereo with audio content from the network. The next device in the genre is a “Videotron” for TV content. Figure 3 shows a home with media servers, digital transformers, and digital media networked appliances (monitor, microphone, telephone, and camera). Current generation plug-in cards for TV capture permit early adopters to move to a digital format now. We posit the Mbox (for media box) that will integrate and replace all A/V components (amplifier, tuner, CD, DVD, set-top box, PVR, and all the remotes) in a home entertainment center (see Figure 4). The Mbox would typically reside in the living room or listening room, would drive each monitor and powered IP speakers, and would operate as either a server for the network or a self-contained platform. The multimedia PC is a prototype of the Mbox, however, the Mbox will be designed for consumer buying habits and sensibilities: it must be quiet, attractive, and remote-control driven.
Any networked device controls the Mbox. This permits browsing the Web from a PC for TV programming, finding an interesting shows or content, and relaying commands to the Mbox to record content. Fast home networks allow optional and fungible Mbox-based storage.
The Mbox provides a considerable challenge. In general, many consumer electronics manufacturers (except a few, such as Sony) are unfamiliar with digital networks and computers. Consumer electronic standards take decades to evolve. Most likely the change will have to come from the PC industry with short, 18-month product gestation times, but the PC industry is equally unfamiliar with television standards. Already, since an earlier version of this article was published as a technical report, Mbox type devices (see Figure 5) have been announced by Microsoft (FreeStyle), and Moxi (Media Center).
Content Distribution, Storage, and Management
Speculation abounds regarding the future of electronic media delivery that is not carried by a physical medium (like CD or DVD). Users of PVRs such as TiVo and UltimateTV have indicated they almost always time-shift TV viewing, playing video from their personal cache at their convenience, rather than watching it at the scheduled time—so-called television “prime time” no longer exists for these users. The same benefit applies to radio (especially when listening from another time zone).
If content will be played from a cache, then it need not arrive in real time. It can be stuffed (prefetched) into the cache by any file-transfer mechanism. Real-time transfer will still be needed for synchronous communication (videophone/telephone). News and sports seem to require real-time transmission, but often do not. News is rarely delivered instantly; it comes on the six o’clock news broadcast or in the news cycle of an all-news station. Viewers may prefer a cached version of the last newscast over waiting for the next one, especially if they can eliminate the commercials that absorb 10%20% of their time. Certainly sports highlights can be cached, and sports occurring in different time zones may be inconvenient to watch live. In addition to time-shifting, playback from a cache makes interactive content faster, for example, browsing a newspaper site’s Web pages from a cache dramatically improves the user experience.
Almost any distribution network is suitable for cache stuffing. Existing Web dialup connections could use FTP, HTTP, IP multicast, or peer-to-peer sharing (à la Napster). Existing television channels and radio stations could be repurposed for digital cache stuffing. Analog channels could switch to digital streams at night to stuff caches, and some digital transmissions could be altered for cache stuffing (sent slightly slower than real time in order to add more error correction).
On the Internet, streaming Video On Demand (VOD) is gaining popularity, and is a way of achieving time-shifting. Some observers insist that content will be stored centrally by service providers that maintain large servers (hubs). Mail services such as Hotmail and Yahoo are examples of a central approach, and photo storage sites like MSN, Ofoto, and Shutterfly reinforce the trend. However, we see a variety of serious problems with a central service approach, including security, control, lack of bandwidth (for the foreseeable future), and most importantly, the cost and commitment to maintain someone’s personal files forever.
Terabyte personal stores for PCs at negligible cost are likely by 2005.1 These will greatly reduce the incentive to store content outside the home (and outside one’s control). Meanwhile, current last-mile bandwidth limitations prevent VOD from achieving even true TV quality, and the cost involved in upgrading the bandwidth and scaling the video servers to achieve this quality will be far greater than the cost of adding cache space in the home for the foreseeable future. Similarly, for portable audio devices, the economics favor increasing the memory of the device rather than supporting wireless on-demand transmission. Reasonable quality streaming audio to the home is feasible over current dialup connections, so perhaps this one flavor of on-demand service will survive, although it is not clear if sufficient benefits exist to win over cache stuffing.
We believe that personal content will be stored primarily in the home, and will be stored outside the home only for the purposes of backup and sharing. Such a personal store presents its own challenges [1]. Like their more advanced corporate database counterparts, managing the media server’s content, including backup, archiving, media life span, and so forth, will become a main consideration for the user.
While we can argue the merits of where personal content should be stored and how it should be distributed, the decision may ultimately be made for us by the content publishers. Publishers do not want their content to be carried in any form that might be digitally copied, so they don’t want it to pass unencrypted over any interface, and are leery about giving it to any device with a removable store. For example, UltimateTV integrates PVR functions with channel tuning such that no interfaces are introduced that would allow digital copying. Going even further, PVRs and DVD players ensure their analog output is impossible for most VCRs to tune (and VCR manufacturers are considered “good citizens” by ensuring their tuners are not robust as those of TVs). Also, content distributors have a problem with time-shifting if the viewers can skip the commercials that pay for the content/distribution (and, for radio in the U.S., recording changes the distribution category, requiring increased royalty payments).
Before willingly participating in the next generation of media distribution, publishers will insist on Digital Rights Management (DRM) to protect their content and ensure their revenues. As DRM matures, cache stuffing will allow for some interesting opportunities such as insertion of advertisements and pay-per-view that can please both viewers and distributors.
Unfortunately, sorting out DRM will involve legal and political issues that may delay progress. The danger of content protection schemes is they may also protect the status quo, and keep us from realizing some of the exciting new prospects of the Home Media Network. For example, one way to protect video content is to have a tuner device that tunes and decodes an encrypted stream and overlays it directly on the video output. This makes manipulation or analysis of the content impossible, preventing one of the key benefits of computerization. A fundamental piece of the Home Media Network will be DRM that enables computer manipulation, rather than disabling it.
Conclusion
The Home Media Network will be a single IP network within the home that connects externally to the Internet, telephone, and cable television networks. Media will flow between home servers and network I/O appliances. This network will enable new content management and distribution, and make time-shifted listening/viewing the norm. Many of the components of a home entertainment center will be replaced by a new network appliance: the Mbox. Legacy devices, such as TV sets, will connect to the Home Media Network via digital transformers.
The speed at which the vision of the Home Media Network materializes is up to the content suppliers and distributors together with the computer and consumer electronics industries. The consumer electronics industry must give up on analog—including cable TV, interlace-scan TV, and legacy audio. We are confident the computer industry will provide alternatives to the monolithic PC. The approach must also allow for the disintegration of the PC, where I/O components become networked devices.
The main ingredients for home media networking are in place: low-cost, high-capacity disk drives approaching a terabyte capacity, excellent compression and networking standards, and a host of prototypical PCs. The thorniest issue is Digital Rights Management to protect intellectual property theft, but progress is being made. It is clear that now is the time for industry to make the Home Media Network a reality.
Figures
Figure 1. Remote controls and bird’s-nest cabling demonstrate the lack of integration in simple home componentized A/V systems.
Figure 2. Home coat and wiring closet supporting: wired and wireless telephony, wired and wireless Ethernet, cable and DSL modems, battery backup, a firewall appliance, and patch panels.
Figure 3. The Home Media Network with digital transformers to support legacy analog devices.
Figure 4. The “Mbox” is a digital home entertainment center with radio and TV tuners, CD, DVD, and PVR, which simplifies the arrangement and adds functionality. Legacy media such as audiocassettes and vinyl records would be reproduced in a digital format. All component cables and separate remotes are eliminated. Later-generation systems will replace amplifier and speakers with powered IP speakers.
Figure 5. Rear view of prototype Mbox to interface with CATV, Ethernet, and various A/V sources.
Join the Discussion (0)
Become a Member or Sign In to Post a Comment