June 1960 - Vol. 3 No. 6

Before discussing the future I want to talk about the past, which I find a source of disappointment. One of the things which prompted me to give the lecture its title was that a number of people who should know better have recently given tongue and pen to the statement that “new, second generation computers are with us” and that these machines are better than anything which has been thought of before. The first part of this lecture will attempt to disabuse you of this idea for, far from thinking that any second generation computer exists, I think that we are only just seeing the growing up of first generation computers. To justify this statement I remark that, in 1946-7, I worked with the late John von Neumann on the logical and physical design of computing machines. Von Neumann wrote, at the Institute for Advanced Study at Princeton, two reports [1, 2] on aims and objectives to which we may look to see the type of computer which was envisaged at that time. This computer was in fact a machine having, in retrospect, certain rather interesting characteristics. The most obvious of these is speed of operation and this was desired to be such that a 40 bit addition or subtraction would take about 10 micro-seconds. There is no computing machine commercially available in this country which achieves this addition time. The multiplication time of the von Neumann machine varied from 400 micro-seconds for the crudest scheme to 50 micro-seconds for a more sophisticated logical device which still made no use of the steam-roller electronics to be seen in at least one machine of the present day, which achieves a rather worse performance. So much for second generation speed!

For the preparation of specialists in computer and machine mathematics and the development of scientific work in this area, the department of computer mathematics was created in 1949 in Moscow State University within the staff of the mechanical-mathematics faculty. This was headed by Academician S. L. Sobolev beginning in 1952.

The connectives “and”, “or” and their alternatives can be used to connect words, phrases or clauses in natural English. In the specifications for the FACT language for the Honeywell 800(1), authors attempted to include as many of these uses as possible while still retaining simple rules as to what was allowable. The compiler operates on connectives by expanding the original source statements, using repetitions, until there has been generated an equivalent statement in which the connectives connect only complete conditional or imperative clauses. This paper describes the methods employed by the compiler for part of this expansion.