January 1985 - Vol. 28 No. 1

January 1985 issue cover image

Features

Research and Advances

The cosmic cube

Sixty-four small computers are connected by a network of point-to-point communication channels in the plan of a binary 6-cube. This “Cosmic Cube” computer is a hardware simulation of a future VLSI implementation that will consist of single-chip nodes. The machine offers high degrees of concurrency in applications and suggests that future machines with thousands of nodes are both feasible and attractive.
Research and Advances

Computer professionals whose scientific freedom and human rights have been violated—1984: a report of the ACM committee on scientific freedom and human rights

This is the third report prepared by the ACM Committee on Scientific Freedom and Human Rights (CSFHR). The first was published in the March 1981 Communications and the second in the December 1982 issue. This report is an update. Since the committee intends to publish future updates, it would appreciate receiving further information about computer scientists whose rights have been violated. Such information should be sent to: Jack Minker, Vice-Chairman, Committee on Scientific Freedom and Human Rights, Department of Computer Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 29742.Because those whose scientific freedom or human rights have been violated derive sustenance and support from contacts with their colleagues, the CSFHR has established a program in which ACM chapters “adopt” individual scientists and correspond with them. Such correspondence should touch on the personal and scientific and not discuss political matters. These letters greatly improve the morale of the recipients and are one of the few ways they can keep current with computer science and technology. This CSFHR program is directed by Helen Takacs (P.O. Drawer CS, Mississippi State, MS 39762).
Research and Advances

An inverted taxonomy of sorting algorithms

An alternative taxonomy (to that of Knuth and others) of sorting algorithms is proposed. It emerges naturally out of a top-down approach to the derivation of sorting algorithms. Work done in automatic program synthesis has produced interesting results about sorting algorithms that suggest this approach. In particular, all sorts are divided into two categories: hardsplit/easyjoin and easysplit/hardjoin. Quicksort and merge sort, respectively, are the canonical examples in these categories. Insertion sort and selection sort are seen to be instances of merge sort and quicksort, respectively, and sinking sort and bubble sort are in-place versions of insertion sort and selection sort. Such an organization introduces new insights into the connections and symmetries among sorting algorithms, and is based on a higher level, more abstract, and conceptually simple basis. It is proposed as an alternative way of understanding, describing, and teaching sorting algorithms.

Recent Issues

  1. January 2025 cover
    January 2025 Vol. 68 No. 1
  2. December 2024 CACM cover
    December 2024 Vol. 67 No. 12
  3. November 2024 CACM cover
    November 2024 Vol. 67 No. 11
  4. October 2024 CACM cover
    October 2024 Vol. 67 No. 10