acm-header
Sign In

Communications of the ACM

ACM News

Are Robotic Surgeries Really Better?


View as: Print Mobile App Share: Send by email Share on reddit Share on StumbleUpon Share on Hacker News Share on Tweeter Share on Facebook
Surgeons using robotic tools during a surgical procedure.

Just because somethings new and fancy doesnt mean its the better technique, said Naila H. Dhanani, a surgical resident at UT Health in Houston. Yes, robotic is safe, weve proven that. But we havent proven its better."

Credit: Leszek Szymanski/EPA/Shutterstock

Surgical procedures performed with the aid of a robot is sometimes marketed as the "best" form of surgery. But a recent review of 50 randomized controlled trials, testing robot-assisted surgeries against conventional methods for abdominal or pelvic procedures, suggests that while there may be some benefits to robotic surgery, any advantages over other approaches are modest.

Robotic surgery is performed by surgeons, not robots. But instead of conventional hand-held tools used in laparoscopic surgery, which involves tiny incisions, and open surgery, in which the surgeon enters the body through a large incision, the doctor uses a machine. The surgeon controls the machine's tools remotely by using joysticks and foot controls while viewing the surgical site through a high-definition monitor that provides a three-dimensional image of the procedure.

Some surgeons believe that these robots allow more precision during the operation, shorter recovery time, and generally better clinical outcomes for patients. But the review found that in many ways, compared outcomes from the robotic and conventional procedures showed little difference.

From The New York Times

View Full Article

 


 

No entries found