Sign In

Communications of the ACM

ACM News

Archaeologists vs. Computers: A Study Tests Who's Best at Sifting the Past


View as: Print Mobile App Share: Send by email Share on reddit Share on StumbleUpon Share on Hacker News Share on Tweeter Share on Facebook
Examples of Tusayan White Ware.

Researchers reported a deep learning model sorted images of decorated pottery shards as accurately as (and occasionally more precisely than) four expert archaeologists did.

Credit: Leszek Pawlowicz and Christian Downum/Northern Arizona University

A key piece of an archaeologist's job involves the tedious process of categorizing shards of pottery into subtypes. Ask archaeologists why they have put a fragment into a particular category and it's often difficult for them to say what exactly had led them to that conclusion.

"It's kind of like looking at a photograph of Elvis Presley and looking at a photo of an impersonator," said Christian Downum, an anthropology professor at Northern Arizona University. "You know something is off with the impersonator, but it's hard to specify why it's not Elvis."

But archaeologists have now demonstrated that it's possible to program a computer to do this critical part of their job as well as they can. In a study published in the June issue of The Journal of Archaeological Science, researchers reported that a deep-learning model sorted images of decorated shards as accurately as — and occasionally more precisely than — four expert archaeologists did.

From The New York Times
View Full Article

 


 

No entries found