An argument recently broke out between two factions of our systems administration team concerning the naming of our next set of hosts. One faction wants to name machines after services, with each host having a numeric suffix, and the other wants to continue our current scheme of each host having a unique name, without a numeric string. We now have so many hosts that any unique name is getting quite longand is annoying to type. A compromise was recently suggested whereby each host could have two names in our internal DNS (Domain Name System), but this seems overly complicated. How do you decide on a host-naming scheme?
I refer you to T.S. Eliot, who pointed outsort of:
The Naming of Hosts is a difficult matter,
It isn't just one of your holiday games;
You may think at first I'm as mad as a hatter
When I tell you, a host must have
THREE DIFFERENT NAMES.
No entries found
Log in to Read the Full Article
Sign InSign in using your ACM Web Account username and password to access premium content if you are an ACM member, Communications subscriber or Digital Library subscriber.
Need Access?Please select one of the options below for access to premium content and features.
Create a Web AccountIf you are already an ACM member, Communications subscriber, or Digital Library subscriber, please set up a web account to access premium content on this site.
Join the ACMBecome a member to take full advantage of ACM's outstanding computing information resources, networking opportunities, and other benefits.
Subscribe to Communications of the ACM MagazineGet full access to 50+ years of CACM content and receive the print version of the magazine monthly.
Purchase the ArticleNon-members can purchase this article or a copy of the magazine in which it appears.