Sign In

Communications of the ACM

BLOG@CACM

Let the Feds Know Your Thoughts on K-12 Computer Science Education


View as: Print Mobile App Share: Send by email Share on reddit Share on StumbleUpon Share on Hacker News Share on Tweeter Share on Facebook
Director Cameron Wilson of ACM's Policy Office Washington

Update 1/21/11: The program running this solicitation has said they will accept comments through Feb. 28. If you miss the 1/31 deadline, submit comments to: pcast2010comments@nitrd.gov.

 

The federal government asks for advice about education fairly regularly. But it isn’t often that it asks specifically what is needed to advance K-12 computer science education. So I was pleasantly surprised when one federal program asked some key questions about K-12 CS education. Members of our community have the opportunity to speak up about what they think is needed for a stronger K-12 CS education. (Comments are due by January 31. Note update above, comments will be accepted through Feb. 28.)

 

Prompted by a report from the President’s top science advisors, The Networking and Information and Technology Research and Development Program (NITRD) asked three sets of big and open-ended questions:

 

“The Presidents Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) report calls for fundamental changes in K-12 STEM education in the United States, including the incorporation of computer science (CS) as an essential component.

 

  • What CS concepts are important to effective elementary, secondary, and post-secondary curricula? Among these concepts, which are commonly found in curricula today? Which are missing?
  • What do teachers need (including preparation and training, tools, and resources) to be able to deliver CS education effectively?
  • What factors are important in promoting student interest in CS?”

PCAST is the President’s high-level body of science and technology advisors, and the report to which these questions refer was issued in mid-December about recommendations for improving the NITRD program. So, what is NITRD? I blogged about it long ago; in short PCAST notes it is, “the primary mechanism by which the Federal government coordinates its unclassified networking and information technology (NIT) research and development (R&D) investments.” A smallish part of this portfolio deals with investments and workforces issues and their obvious connection to the R&D enterprise. 


ACM’s Education Policy Committee has been pushing NITRD and PCAST on the numerous policy issues that K-12 CS Education faces. In response, PCAST recommended in an earlier K-12 STEM education report that computer science should called out by policy makers as a critical part of the STEM agenda. This new report reaches the same conclusion and prods NITRD to take steps to ensure CS is an “essential component” in K-12. These questions represent the program’s first steps to meet this goal.

 

This is a great opportunity for educators from the computing community that work on K-12 CS education issues, curriculum, instruction or generally anything in the subject. It isn’t often that the community gets asked for advice on these issues. We should take advantage by filing comments on their questions.


Comments


Anonymous

I have been thinking about this for a long time.

What CS concepts are important to effective elementary, secondary, and post-secondary curricula? Among these concepts, which are commonly found in curricula today? Which are missing? What do teachers need (including preparation and training, tools, and resources)

Further collaboration of teachers , researchers and college professors, in programs that have teachers as a part of the planning and decision making/ and replicate programs like ITEST and Northwestern;s STEM program.

Specialized teams for broadening engagement that involve minorities as mentor teachers and online support.

Break the silos by providing membership in several groups such as NSTA, NCTM, CSTA, etc and have workshops that are funded at the conferences such as the one that is going to be held in California prior to NSTA but there should be geographic workshops of a similar nature . I do applaud the coming together of Dept of Ed and NSF. Finally.

Funded professional development for committed teacher, parents and others.

People who work in this venue and who have some experience to share need to talk and think together


Displaying 1 comment